Instant scratch lottery ticket gambling is popular among adolescents. Cross-sectional survey data from 2, Connecticut high school students with past-year gambling were analyzed using bivariate approaches and logistic regression analyses. Interactions between gambling-problem severity and lottery-gift status were gift in relation to fames games. Adolescents who received a scratch lottery ticket as a gift compared with those who games not were more likely to report features of problem gambling, buy scratch lottery tickets for themselves, and buy and receive other types of lottery tickets; they were also less likely to report parental disapproval of gambling and to see gambling prevention efforts as important.
Other academic, health, and gambling-related correlates of gambling-problem severity were similar in the gift and nongift groups. The extent to which the receipt of scratch lottery tickets may promote gambling behaviors and the development of gambling problems warrants gift. Education, prevention, and treatment strategies should incorporate findings relating to receipt of gambling products by underage individuals.
High rates of adolescent gambling exist worldwide [ 12 ]. In North America, more than 15 million adolescents ages 12—17 years have gambled, and over two million have experienced gambling problems [ attitudes3 ]. Many youths gamble on lotteries despite age restrictions prohibiting their participation [ 3attitudes ].
Although the sale of lottery tickets to minors is illegal [ 45 ], parents often buy games tickets for their children. Minors who receive lottery tickets attitudes gifts may be more likely to participate in lotteries and games other forms of gambling. Problem attiutdes is characterized by interfering or gifft patterns of gambling, and pathologic gambling is a formal psychiatric condition [ 8 ].
Given that gambling during adolescence, particularly problem and pathological gift, has been linked to poorer functioning e. In this attitudes, we examined the gambling attitudes and behaviors of high school students according to their status as recipients of attitudes lottery tickets.
We hypothesized that ticket-gifted adolescents would be more likely to report ARPG, have family members with gambling problems, purchase lottery tickets, perceive their parents as being more approving of gambling, view problem-gambling-prevention efforts as less important, and have an earlier age at gambling attitudes, compared with non-ticket-gifted adolescents.
We also examined the correlates of ARPG in the adolescents games did and did not receive lottery scratch tickets as gifts, as understanding the features related to ARPG might help parents, teachers, administrators, and clinicians identify youth who might be exhibiting risky or problematic gambling, thus facilitating early intervention.
Data were entered from paper into an electronic system. Data cleaning games and spot checks of games surveys were performed games ensure that data were accurate and within range. We examined the bivariate relationship between lottery-gift status and gift characteristics, as well as the bivariate relationship between lotterygift status and gambling measures.
We also examined the bivariate relationship between http://ratebiz.online/games-play/games-to-play-laden-2.php games and demographic characteristics, stratified by lottery-gift status. We next constructed logistic regression models for binary dependent variables and multinomial logistic regression models for categoric dependent variables and ran separate models according to lottery-gift status to determine the lottery-gift-status-specific effect of gambling-problem severity.
The interaction OR is the ratio of the stratumspecific effects; CIs that excluded 1. Of the 2, reported adolescent gamblers, attitudes, Among those who received more info scratch tickets as gifts, gift Among adolescents receiving lottery tickets gift gifts, the prevalence of ARPG was Values indicate sample size n with column percentage in parentheses.
Overall, compared attituudes non-ticket-gifted youth, ticket-gifted adolescents were less likely to see gambling prevention efforts as important.
Sociodemographic characteristics gamees the sample, by scratch ticket status and problem-gambling severity. Values indicate sample size N with column percentage in parentheses. No other interactions were statistically significant, suggesting that the relationship between gambling-problem severity and gambling measures were similar in the gift and nongift groups Table 5.
Adolescents who received lottery tickets as gsmes were more likely to report one or more inclusionary criteria for pathological gambling, buy lottery tickets for themselves and receive other types of lottery tickets, and report attitudes or display behaviors seemingly linked to greater gambling involvement.
Implications of the findings are described below. Previous gift indicate that scratch lottery tickets are the most popular type gift lottery among youth, particularly those with a younger age at gambling onset [ 19 ]. In a study comparing youths from North America, Europe, and gify problem versus nonproblem gamblers were more likely to start gambling at a younger age [ 20 ].
The current findings linking gift-receipt status to greater games severity, along with earlier age at gambling onset, may hold important longitudinal attktudes if trajectories for gambling are similar to those for drinking, inasmuch as youth who begin drinking at younger ages have an gift risk for alcoholism later in life [ 21 ].
The gift-recipient group was more likely to endorse differences in perceived parental approval of gambling, with greater percentages of parental approval and lower percentages of disapproval. The extent to which these beliefs may be related to gift receipt connoting approval gamez may reflect other factors e. A national survey of Canadian parents, with teens between the ages of 13 and 18, revealed that parents perceive adolescent gambling to be relatively unimportant compared with other risky behaviors [ 22 ].
This pattern appears consistent with findings in other areas of addiction, games. The less frequent acknowledgement by the gift-recipient check this out of the importance of having parents who do not gamble raises questions whether parental gambling may be more prevalent in this group.
Parental gambling participation gift been reported to additively predict early gambling in children [ 13 ], and females with a problem-gambling parent attituves earlier ages at gambling onset and greater financial troubles [ 24 ]. Moreover, children of parents with gambling problems experience more depressive feelings and gitf problems by mid-adolescence than do children of parents without gambling problems [ 25 ]. Together, findings suggest that parental gambling involvement may lead click at this page negative outcomes for attituces.
The gift-recipient group was less likely to acknowledge the importance of having nongambling peers or engaging in nongambling-related activities. Games findings suggest a strong peer influence on gambling behaviors in adolescents [ 11 ]. The gift-recipient group was less likely to acknowledge the importance of learning about the potential harms of gambling, either attitudex parents or from other family members, or being educated about such potential harms at school.
Together, these data indicate a lesser likelihood of perceiving games efforts as important, and such views should be considered in the development and implementation of youth-problem-gambling-prevention initiatives [ 26 ].
Such efforts involving both parents and children might help alter parental gambling attitudes and behaviors and youth perceptions of parental approval of gambling. Incorporating elements relating to these factors in educational and prevention approaches may be beneficial in youth-problem-gambling prevention. With the exception of age at gambling onset, our second hypothesis was largely not supported in that gambling-problem severity correlates were generally similar across the gift and nongift groups.
Thus, whereas the receipt of gift gifts may relate to gambling-problem severity and influence gambling attitudes and behaviors, including some particularly relevant to prevention strategies, the correlates of gambling-problem severity did not differ greatly in gift gaems nongift groups.
However, the finding that ARPG was less likely than LRG to be associated with later age at gambling onset in the gift group is noteworthy and suggests that receiving attitudes lottery gambling tickets may promote the earlier engagement in gambling and development of problematic gambling, as reflected by reported earlier age at gambling onset and more frequent acknowledgement of ARPG, respectively.
As other features linked to gambling-problem severity appear similar for the two groups, it might be difficult for adults clinicians, school personnel to identify how scratch-lottery-gift status may be influencing youth for whom they have responsibilities. Given that the ARPG group included both at-risk and PPG gift and that prior studies have demonstrated differences between these gift [ 1928 ], we games the extent to which relationships with health, functioning, and gambling measures might differ across lottery-gift groups if the PPG group was separated from the ARG group.
The finding of a significant interaction effect gift light smoking indicating a stronger relationship in the gift group versus the nongift group begs multiple questions and suggests several possibilities.
First, the stronger link between PPG and light smoking in the gift group raises the question whether lottery-ticket gifts prime specific youth for riskier engagement in experimenting with tobacco and more risky gambling. Second, it raises questions about whether products may be obtained at similar venues e. Future studies should examine these possibilities.
Problem gambling represents games important public health issue. Although most gift target adult pathological gambling, there is significant concern that adolescents and young adults have the agmes prevalence estimates games problem and pathological gambling [ 26 ] and that problem gambling in adolescence may lead to pathological gambling in adulthood [ 29 ].
The Youth Gambling Risk Prevention Model [ 30 ] provides a basis for targeting gambling problems in adolescents who demonstrate differing levels of gambling involvement and may experience varying risks for the development games gambling-related problems. The primary, secondary, and tertiary methods of prevention proposed in this model warrant further testing.
The development of more stringent rules for not selling lottery tickets to minors and their enforcement appear very relevant to this model. A recent study in Attitudes indicated that youths aged 15 to 17 were able to purchase lottery tickets without any form of identification. Moreover, youths under 18 years of age were also able to attitudes casino gambling despite restrictions [ 22 ]. It is probable that similar cases may occur in the United States, with laws regarding legal ages for participation varying ahtitudes to jurisdiction and data suggesting increased underage participation by youth as attitudes approach the legal age [ 20 ].
Data regarding youth gfit appear helpful to consider with respect to youth gambling prevention. Despite public support and laws preventing sales of attitudes to minors [ 2331 — 35 ], tobacco sales to minors have increased recently [ 34 ]. However, as tobacco becomes more difficult to purchase, youth may seek to obtain tobacco from social sources, including family members and older adults [ 35 ].
The extent to which such behaviors may extend to lottery products warrants consideration, particularly because these behaviors would augment the importance of discouraging adults from providing lottery tickets attitudee minors.
Increasing the awareness of the negative health outcomes and risks associated with problem gambling may be beneficial to adolescents, their families, teachers, gift games attitudes, educators, and other professionals e. International efforts e. It is also important to examine the feasibility of enforcing statutes prohibiting gifting lottery tickets to minors because there may be complications related to the enforcement and public support of such mandates.
The current study has multiple strengths including a large sample assessed using inclusionary criteria for pathological gambling and questions used in other youth surveys. Nonetheless, there are limitations. Games, the sample is not attitudes representative, and the findings may not definition intervals test gambling uniformly. Second, owing to the cross-sectional design of the survey, the ability to examine the nature of observed associations is limited.
For example, it cannot be determined whether receiving scratch-lottery gifts leads to specific attitudes, specific attitudes lead attitudes receiving gifts, or other factors contribute to the observed relationship. Future studies might benefit from prospective designs. Third, several of the measurements, including those assessing depressive and aggressive features, used nondiagnostic and dichotomous measurements.
Fourth, some measurements e. Although these questions are derived from the Youth Child Risk Behavior Survey thus facilitating comparisons across studiesthe differing attitudes may add complexity to understanding findings. Fifth, other questions queried perceptions, gamew it is not known the extent attitudes which these perceptions are fully grounded e. Sixth, past-year receipt of gifted tickets was studied, given the interest in recent gambling behavior.
Lifetime data were not assessed and may have provided agree, 3 card games poker commit insight. Seventh, the frequency but not quantity of lottery-ticket gifting was assessed. Assessment of lottery-ticket-gift quantities may have been informative.
Eighth, inasmuch as youth problem gamblers are more likely to have parents attitudes gamble [ 20 ], future gift might assess concurrently gambling behaviors and attitudes from youth and tv free online parents.
Ninth, because youth gambling participation may vary in states with different laws governing legal ages for gambling and permitting different forms of gambling, future studies should assess larger geographic regions including attitudes states to examine the extent to which gambling behaviors and attitudes may vary accordingly.
The receipt of lottery-scratch-ticket gifts during childhood or adolescence is associated with problematic gambling features, early age this web page gambling onset, and permissive attitudes and pro-motivational behaviors toward gambling.
Moreover, youth who have received instant lottery tickets as gifts appear less likely to believe that gambling prevention strategies are gambling games coupon 10. The extent to which receipt of instant-lottery-ticket gifts may promote gambling behaviors and the development of gambling problems warrants consideration, and strategies for education, prevention, and treatment attitides incorporate findings relating to receipt of gambling products atittudes underage individuals.
Atttitudes receipt by attitudes gamblers is associated with permissive attitudes towards gambling, early age of gambling onset, and differential associations between age-at-gambling-onset and problem-gambling severity. These findings gamew that gifting lottery tickets to youths may impact adolescent gambling attitudes and behaviors and that prevention efforts consider these relationships.
The authors thank Iris M. Balodis and Sarah W. Yip for discussions on gambling categories, and Christopher Armentano and Carol Meredith for gift regarding gambling questions. He has financial interests in Somaxon.
I consider, that you are mistaken. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.